- From: Nicholas Bollweg <nick.bollweg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:16:21 -0500
- To: Peter Amstutz <peter.amstutz@curoverse.com>
- Cc: public-linked-json <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACejjWzw7c7tZgzs0nP5vaztc8FNxq3X=oMY1naem+woYrHeLw@mail.gmail.com>
Peter: That's the rub right now. It's too bad, as one of the claims that JSON-LD is > unambiguously machine-readable without requiring developers to drastically > change their documents > but maps are just too handy, they're all over the place... and JSON-LD doesn't handle them very well. I think the challenge is that they are used in so many ways. I first encountered this when trying to understand the `dependencies` key in a package.json, like this example sanitized, canonical example (I wouldn't even try against in-the-wild package.json): http://registry.npmjs.org/backbone/1.0.0 Now, I could imagine some filigreed RDF that describes this really accurately, but the developers has been able to tell this story very concisely: that's a lot to pack into a little map, which is why developers like it. I have yet to find a compelling solution, but it's important to keep this on the radar. Perhaps there is a way to do it without introducing new @ keywords. Imagining, for your case, if you're looking for literals: { "@context": { "ex": "http://example.com#", "components": { "@id": "ex:components", "@container": { "@index": { "@id": "ex:name", "@type": "xsd:string" }, "@value": { "@id": "ex:value", "@type": "xsd:int" } } } }, "components": { "foo": 1, "bar": 2 } } Or for my case: where I am expecting URIs: { "@context": { "pkg": "https://www.npmjs.org/doc/files/package.json.html#", "reg": "https://registry.npmjs.org/", "dependencies": { "@id": "pkg:dependencies", "@container": { "@index": { "@id": "@type", "@type": "@id", "@base": "@reg" }, "@value": { "@id": "pkg:version", "@type": "@id" } } } }, "dependencies": { "underscore": ">=1.4.3" } } Still leaves much to be desired. I guess I still think preprocessing will be required for a lot of these more complicated shapes.
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 03:16:49 UTC