- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:24:14 +0200
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
good afternoon; On 20 Jul 2014, at 13:01, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: >> [ … eliding apparent confusion about how one represents graph transformations …] > > Simply speaking, terms such as myIdAlias are first replaced with the keyword > they alias (@id) and then processed as usual. The processing is defined in > detail in the JSON-LD Processing Algorithms & API specification: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api/ must one use an intermediate json-equivalent data model in order use json-ld as the abstract means to frame rdf? > > >> i note, also, that as the expression conflates either the processing role > and >> the universal identifier, or the member term and the universal identifier, > it >> lacks the degrees of freedom required to specify all combinations. > > Could you elaborate? > > >> is there yet another alternative? > > I can tell you if you explain me what you are trying to achieve :-) > how would one declare how to frame _:thing1 <http://example.com/id> <http://example.com/thing#1> . _:thing1 <http://example.com/type> <http://example.com/ImportantThing> . _:thing2 <http://example.com/feature> <http://example.com/thing#2> . _:thing2 <http://example.com/id> <http://example.com/thing#2> . _:thing2 <http://example.com/type> <http://example.com/Feature> . _:thing2 <http://example.com/characteristic> “low power consumption" . into [ { “key” : <http://example.com/thing#1>, “class”: <http://example.com/ImportantThing>, “features” : [ { “key” : <http://example.com/thing#2>, “class”: <http://example.com/Feature>, “detail”: “low power consumption" } ] } ] ? best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Sunday, 20 July 2014 13:24:45 UTC