- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:24:14 +0200
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
good afternoon;
On 20 Jul 2014, at 13:01, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>> [ … eliding apparent confusion about how one represents graph transformations …]
>
> Simply speaking, terms such as myIdAlias are first replaced with the keyword
> they alias (@id) and then processed as usual. The processing is defined in
> detail in the JSON-LD Processing Algorithms & API specification:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api/
must one use an intermediate json-equivalent data model in order use json-ld as the abstract means to frame rdf?
>
>
>> i note, also, that as the expression conflates either the processing role
> and
>> the universal identifier, or the member term and the universal identifier,
> it
>> lacks the degrees of freedom required to specify all combinations.
>
> Could you elaborate?
>
>
>> is there yet another alternative?
>
> I can tell you if you explain me what you are trying to achieve :-)
>
how would one declare how to frame
_:thing1 <http://example.com/id> <http://example.com/thing#1> .
_:thing1 <http://example.com/type> <http://example.com/ImportantThing> .
_:thing2 <http://example.com/feature> <http://example.com/thing#2> .
_:thing2 <http://example.com/id> <http://example.com/thing#2> .
_:thing2 <http://example.com/type> <http://example.com/Feature> .
_:thing2 <http://example.com/characteristic> “low power consumption" .
into
[ { “key” : <http://example.com/thing#1>,
“class”: <http://example.com/ImportantThing>,
“features” : [ { “key” : <http://example.com/thing#2>, “class”: <http://example.com/Feature>, “detail”: “low power consumption" } ] } ]
?
best regards, from berlin,
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Sunday, 20 July 2014 13:24:45 UTC