W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Update RDFa snippet to RDFa Lite

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:35:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFr5v9Ru4Z5DYC_b_5or1hBGud3T6ai6NWe-Qf=_hhf5yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: St├ęphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 16 January 2014 16:37, St├ęphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could the following RDFa snippet by updated to be more in line with RDFa
> Lite?
> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#rdfa
> Like this:
> <div prefix="foaf: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
>    <ul>
>       <li typeof="foaf:Person">
>         <a property="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/bob/"><span
> property="foaf:name">Bob</span></a>
>       </li>
>       <li typeof="foaf:Person">
>         <a property="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/eve/"><span
> property="foaf:name">Eve</span></a>
>       </li>
>       <li typeof="foaf:Person">
>         <a property="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/manu/"><span
> property="foaf:name">Manu</span></a>
>       </li>
>    </ul>
> </div>

We could add something like this to the FOAF spec next time it gets
tweaked. Which could be next week, next year or next decade.

Q: why do you use an explicit @prefix if you want to show the
simplicity of RDFa Lite? Is there any doubt on the reliability of the
Initial Context 'built in prefixes' mechanism? I wasn't planning to
use @prefix in the FOAF spec when we add some RDFa examples.

Received on Monday, 20 January 2014 17:35:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:40 UTC