Re: JSON-LD Compaction and Compact IRIs as values

Thank you kindly Dave. What I ended up doing - based on your feedback - was
to make the following changes:

The input document was modified to:

"x:purpose": {
   "@type": "@id"
},
"https://example.org/pub/x#purpose": {
   "@type": "@id"
}

Which catches both ways purpose can be made. And in the new context I make
sure it comes out correctly with

"x:purpose": {
   "@type": "@id"
}

Just in terms of JSON-LD going forward, may I suggest that's there's
"Principle of Least Surprise" violation going on here and that compact IRIs
in the @context should be expanded in this case (and maybe others).

D.



On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Dave Longley
<dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> I posted an answer for you at Stack Overflow.
>
> On 01/17/2014 10:19 AM, David Janes wrote:
> > I've posted a question to Stack Overflow about JSON-LD Compaction, if
> > anyone would like to take a stab at answering it (here or there).
> >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21185001/json-ld-compaction-and-compact-iris-as-values
> >
> > Thanks,
> > D.
>
>
> --
> Dave Longley
> CTO
> Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>