- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:20:44 -0800
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net On Feb 25, 2014, at 2:08 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:00 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> On Feb 23, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gregg, >>> >>> Please find attached an updated conformance report for JSONLD-Java. >> >> Congratulations on getting to 100%! I've updated the report >> <http://json-ld.org/test-suite/reports/>. > > Cool! You now pass all tests except "remote document". > > Gregg, would it be possible to add a row to the report indicating the > overall conformance and report skipped tests in all tables? At the moment > the numbers are a bit misleading as the report simply omits skipped tests. > In the case of JSONLD-Java e.g., all remote tests are missing (there's no > column in the remote document table) and thus the summary at > http://json-ld.org/test-suite/reports/#subj_7 consists of just 100% items. > If you are not careful, you will overlook that none of the remote document > tests has been executed. Thus, the overall conformance would be 96,8% and > not 100%. Good point, I explicitly remove columns from the report detail section where there are no results, but the per-processor report could describe something for every section, regardless. I'll put that feature on my queue and regenerate the report. Gregg > Cheers, > Markus > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 00:21:15 UTC