- From: Nicholas Bollweg <nick.bollweg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:17:46 -0500
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: public-linked-json <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 1 December 2014 23:18:13 UTC
As we have seen a number of times here on the list, objects made from an unknowably large set of of keys are hard to do anything compelling with... see package.json//dependencies/, ipython.ipynb//cells/output/data/. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:57 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to clarify, for conversations in Social WG, what > limitations JSON-LD puts on JSON. > > Currently I can only recall one related to list of lists > http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#h_note_8 > > Any other limitations? > > Social WG charter states[1]: > *Social Data Syntax* - A JSON-based syntax to allow the transfer of > social information, such as status updates, across differing social > systems. One input to this deliverable is ActivityStreams 2.0 > > While discussing benefits of building around JSON-LD, I would also like > that we can stay very clear about all the possible drawbacks. > > Thank you for all relevant references and comments! > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html#deliverables > >
Received on Monday, 1 December 2014 23:18:13 UTC