Re: Default @type

If you use properties which you define and only use on the same type of
resource, you can in the vocabulary where the property is defined add
rdfs:domain to the implied type of the subject (and rdfs:range to type the
object)

It would however require additional RDFS or OWL reasoning beyond the
regular JSON-LD processing to get those typing triples. In RDF stores like
Jena this is normally just a simple configuration option combined with
loading the vocabulary.
On 7 Aug 2014 20:34, "David Janes" <davidjanes@davidjanes.com> wrote:

> Let's say I have some temperature / humidity data
>
>     {
>       "temperature" : 22.1,
>       "humidity" : 44
>     }
>
> I can mark this up semantically using JSON-LD as follows (note the JSON-LD
> at the link is a little wonky right now in terms of naming):
>     {
>       "@type" : "https://iotdb.org/iotdb/models/firmata-dht11",
>       "@context" : "https://iotdb.org/iotdb/models/firmata-dht11",
>       "temperature" : 22.1,
>       "humidity" : 44
>     }
>
> Great, this record now has a type and proper definitions for temperature
> and humidity.
>
> But let's say I want to leave the record alone and use HTTP Links headers
> to annotate, as per [1]. Obviously I get the @context. But how do I get the
> @type associated with the record?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#interpreting-json-as-json-ld
>
> Regards,
>
> D.
>
>
>