- From: Ka-Sing Chou <ka-sing@quantumspork.nl>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 00:45:01 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>, ryan@damnhandy.com
- Cc: "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPXxd89sRhs5pLLgAdzUjFdp8_QrYaHJZHWA8J4bJmnsgT_nDw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, Thanks Gregg Kellogg and Ryan for the replies. I made a mistake on the creation attempt of the JSON-LD. Well... as for Ryan's link. I checked the http://rdf-translator.appspot.com/. I analyzed the output for the earlier url, however it doesn't contain information on the itemref's. Am I correct with this statement? On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>wrote: > On Sep 1, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Ka-Sing Chou <ka-sing@quantumspork.nl> wrote: > > Dear JSON-LD Community, > > I have been studying JSON-LD for a while and I just did an attempt to > create JSON-LD based on an existing webpage. However, I have no idea if the > output is correct. I really hope you guys can help me out a bit: > > JSON-LD: https://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-pakketten/mkb-geavanceerd.json > Based on: https://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-pakketten/mkb-geavanceerd<https://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-pakketten/mkb-geavanceerd.json> > / > > Anyway... a contextless json-ld, which contains every detailed information > is also correct, right? If someone has a better idea on how I can improve > this, please let me know. > > > The JSON does not look like JSON-LD at all; instead, it looks like > microdata JSON. To be JSON-LD, it must either have an @context, or use an > external context. Moreover, JSON-LD does not keep properties under a > "properties", or any other kind of container. > > A good way to check your JSON-LD is using the playground: > http://json-ld.org/playground. > > Gregg > > Big thanks in advance. > > -- > Friendly regards, > > Ka-Sing Chou > +31 6 - 54 76 30 81 > ka-sing@quantumspork.nl > > > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Ka-Sing Chou 06 - 54 76 30 81 ka-sing@quantumspork.nl
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 22:45:29 UTC