Re: GSoC Final Project Deadlines

Thanks for bringing this up.

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>wrote:

> It's reasonable, but pretty shallow, and certainly doesn't follow the best
> practices of Linked Data. For example, it shows that Wikia is one of
> companies I work for, but just has a blank node with name "Wikia". Looking
> at the returned JSON from LinkedIn, though, there's enough information to
> create an actual IRI for it. Looking at the returned JSON, I see the
> following for positions:
>
>    "positions": {
>       "_total": 15,
>       "values": [{
>         "company": {
>           "id": 157252,
>           "industry": "Internet",
>           "name": "Wikia",
>           "size": "51-200 employees",
>           "type": "Privately Held"
>         },
>         "id": 291520813,
>         "isCurrent": true,
>         "startDate": {
>           "month": 6,
>           "year": 2012
>         },
>         "summary": "Adding structure to wikis.",
>         "title": "Linked Data Consultant, Advisory Board member"
>     ...
>
> This is enough to link to the company, and provide some context for the
> work I've done with them. At the least, I would create an @id referencing
> the Wikia profile. This would just be <
> http://www.linkedin.com/company/157252>, which you can figure out given
> that it is a "company" position, and has an id. Same would hold for other
> references, such as education.
>

Yes, initially I did thought of doing this by generating IRI's as you said
-> linkedin.com/company/id for companies and
linkedin.com/edu/school?id=<http://linked.com/edu/school?id=>but it
seems it will also generate misleading url incase where the
organisations (company, school..) dont have their profile on LinkedIn. And
we tend to get [1],[2] and [3]. A 404 page saying Company/Scholl does not
exist. So as a result I thought it would be good to have it this way
instead of having wrong information.



>
> Also, the "owns" information isn't too useful. It like your setting a type
> of <http://schema/url>, which is a property, not a type. And your using
> the account URL as the name and throwing the name away. For example, the
> following:
>
> {
>   "@type": "url",
>   "name": "http://www.kellogg-assoc.com"
> }
>
>
Thanks for the notification


> Where the information from LinkedIn is:
>
>     "memberUrlResources": {
>       "_total": 3,
>       "values": [{
>         "name": "Personal Website",
>         "url": "http://www.kellogg-assoc.com"
>       }, {
>         "name": "Laudits",
>         "url": "http://www.laudits.com/pub/1162/gregg-kellogg/7trdv"
>       }, {
>         "name": "Twyla",
>         "url": "
> http://www.twylah.com/Gkellogg?utm_source=New+users+week+of+20120319&utm_campaign=4d564b7e48-New_20120321&utm_medium=email
> "
>       }]
>     }
>
> From that, I would think that you'd do more the following:
>
> {
>   "@id": "http://www.kellogg-assoc.com",
>   "name"Personal Website"
> }
>
>
Fixed: Yes, this is done. Can you please check it once to verify if this is
what you intended.


You might be able to figure out that it has a @type of
> schema:OwnershipInfo, as that is the range of schema:owns (look at
> http://schema.org/owns).
>

My bad, I dint realise this. I have rectified it to OwnershipInfo.

So, did you encounter any more issues? And are things looking ok now?

Regards
~Vikash

[1] - https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5278881/GSoC/Companies404.png
[2] - https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5278881/GSoC/School404.png
[3] - https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5278881/GSoC/School404-1.png


Regards
~Vikash

>  Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
>