Re: Quality review requested on JSON-LD output based on existing webpage.

+1 on the JSON-LD Playground. As someone who also relatively new to JSON-LD, this has been an incredibly helpful tool. Also have a look at the RDF Translator:

http://rdf-translator.appspot.com/

This is another useful tool if you're interested in determining that your JSON-LD document properly translates into other RDF formats or microdata. The combination of the two have helped me create JSON-LD output that looks more like your standard JSON while also ensuring that it's also proper RDF. 

Ryan-


On Sep 2, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> wrote:

> On Sep 1, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Ka-Sing Chou <ka-sing@quantumspork.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Dear JSON-LD Community,
>> 
>> I have been studying JSON-LD for a while and I just did an attempt to create JSON-LD based on an existing webpage. However, I have no idea if the output is correct. I really hope you guys can help me out a bit:
>> 
>> JSON-LD: https://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-pakketten/mkb-geavanceerd.json
>> Based on: https://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-pakketten/mkb-geavanceerd/
>> 
>> Anyway... a contextless json-ld, which contains every detailed information is also correct, right? If someone has a better idea on how I can improve this, please let me know.
> 
> The JSON does not look like JSON-LD at all; instead, it looks like microdata JSON. To be JSON-LD, it must either have an @context, or use an external context. Moreover, JSON-LD does not keep properties under a "properties", or any other kind of container.
> 
> A good way to check your JSON-LD is using the playground: http://json-ld.org/playground.
> 
> Gregg
> 
>> Big thanks in advance.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Friendly regards,
>> 
>> Ka-Sing Chou
>> +31 6 - 54 76 30 81
>> ka-sing@quantumspork.nl
>