- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:21:04 +0200
- To: "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 20 October 2013 09:21:31 UTC
Hi, I add a surprise today using @reverse with blank node: { "@context": { "foo": "http://example.org/foo", "bar": { "@reverse": "http://example.org/", "@type": "@id" } }, "foo": "Foo", "bar": "http://example.org/origin" } produces the following graph: <http://example.org/origin> <http://example.org/> _:b1 . _:b0 <http://example.org/foo> "Foo" . with *two different bnodes*!... I have the same behaviour with PyLD and the online playground, so may be this is a deliberate feature of the JSON-LD algorithm (I didn't go and check the API document, I admit...). But if it is so there should be a big warning sign in the syntax document, because this is *very* counter-intuitive. pa
Received on Sunday, 20 October 2013 09:21:31 UTC