W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > October 2013

Quality output check on my microdata 2 JSON-LD tool

From: Ka-Sing Chou <ka-sing@quantumspork.nl>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 01:49:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPXxd894_ZQCZUo-jRQ7+gCVGJ_59oFWga+vVzcSV_Qs5Y8S3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
Cc: Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>, "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>, Ryan McDonough <ryan@damnhandy.com>
Dear Gregg Kellogg,

For the last couple of days I have been busy with creating a tool to
convert webpages with microdata to JSON-LD. You can find this tool via this
url: https://www.seoprovider.nl/content/microdata2jsonld/
However, I haven't had the time to tidy it up the layout, but if you copy
paste the output to JSON-LD playground, I think it will look pretty neat.
(don't forget to copy paste the context to the context section of the
playground).

Anyway... my main question: "Is the output correct or do I miss something?"

Input:
https://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-diensten/snelheid-en-semantische-optimalisatie/<http://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-diensten/snelheid-en-semantische-optimalisatie/>
JSON-LD output:
https://www.seoprovider.nl/content/microdata2jsonld/?url=https://www.seoprovider.nl/seo-diensten/snelheid-en-semantische-optimalisatie/


For now all the @id's are the same as the input URL, but do you think I
have to be more specific on the @id's by providing the correct URI's that
targets a specific ID object?

-- 
Friendly regards,

Ka-Sing Chou
06 - 54 76 30 81
ka-sing@quantumspork.nl
Received on Sunday, 13 October 2013 23:50:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:39 UTC