- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 22:58:59 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: JSON-LD CG <public-linked-json@w3.org>
I guess our emails crossed.
Are you only proceeding with 'json-ld' not 'json-ld-api'? Or if you
mean both, then what's the plan re Promises?
On 10/08/2013 10:47 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> We expect JSON-LD to come out of CR and be ready to go to PR by next
> week. RDF Concepts is now blocking JSON-LD from going to PR and on to
> REC. Could the RDF WG please discuss how we can resolve this issue on
> the call tomorrow?
>
> The options that have been discussed so far are:
>
> 1. Make the JSON-LD data model and the reference to RDF Concepts
> non-normative, go to REC, and make the reference normative when
> RDF Concepts goes to REC. This seems like the best option.
You want to do two more publications and a second AC review 3 months
later just to make this tiny change?
> 2. Delay JSON-LD proceeding to REC until RDF Concepts becomes a
> REC. This would be a terrible outcome.
What specific harm will be done by delaying json-ld by two months?
-- Sandro
> Thoughts?
>
> -- manu
>
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 02:59:07 UTC