Friday, 31 May 2013
- RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD]
- Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD]
- Resolutions for features at risk
- FW: [Json] WG Action: Formed JavaScript Object Notation (json)
Wednesday, 29 May 2013
Tuesday, 28 May 2013
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-28
- Re: Restrictions on reverse term definitions
- Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 28th 2013
Monday, 27 May 2013
Sunday, 26 May 2013
Thursday, 23 May 2013
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
- RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
Monday, 20 May 2013
- Funding kick-off for: Code for the Web - Linked Data and Web Payments
- RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129
- RE: Restrictions on reverse term definitions
- Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129
- RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129
Sunday, 19 May 2013
- Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 21st 2013
- Restrictions on reverse term definitions
- Re: JSON-LD for USG
- Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129
- RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129
Saturday, 18 May 2013
Friday, 17 May 2013
Thursday, 16 May 2013
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Preview: KickStarter for Linked Data and Web Payments
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- RDF WG Resolutions
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
Monday, 13 May 2013
- RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 14th 2013
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 14th 2013
Saturday, 11 May 2013
Thursday, 9 May 2013
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange
- RE: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
Tuesday, 7 May 2013
- RE: Marking issues resolved
- Re: Query languages LDPath / JSON-LD Framing
- Marking issues resolved
- RE: Query languages LDPath / JSON-LD Framing
- Re: Query languages LDPath / JSON-LD Framing
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-07
- RE: Query languages LDPath / JSON-LD Framing
- Query languages LDPath / JSON-LD Framing
- Re: Proposal: JSON-LD CR and LC2 timeline
- Proposal: JSON-LD CR and LC2 timeline
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 7th 2013
Monday, 6 May 2013
Saturday, 4 May 2013
Friday, 3 May 2013
- Re: JSON to JSON-LD Creator App
- JSON to JSON-LD Creator App
- RE: role syntax and role instance - help needed
- role syntax and role instance - help needed
- RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- Re: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- RE: Lists with Identity
- Re: First implementation report for JSON-LD
Thursday, 2 May 2013
- Re: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- Re: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- RE: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- Re: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- RE: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- First implementation report for JSON-LD
Wednesday, 1 May 2013
- RE: Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD
- Re: Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD
- Re: Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD
- Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD
- Re: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- Re: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- Fwd: JSON-LD: Please keep @base
- RE: Type Coercion question
- Re: Type Coercion question