Re: Intent to close ISSUE-222

I still owe proposed editorial changes to the API spec, but I think that 
is tracked under 132 now, so 222 can be closed.

Thanks again for all your work on this!

David

On 07/23/2013 05:02 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> In ISSUE-222 [1] we have been tracking the David Booth's and Peter
> Patel-Schneider's JSON-LD 1.0 syntax spec review feedback. Most of it has
> been addressed, for the rest there are separate issues (RDF-ISSUE-132 [2],
> RDF-ISSUE-134 [3]).
>
> Unless I hear objections, I will therefore close ISSUE-222 [1]. I will keep
> the issues in the RDF WG tracker open for the time being.
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/222
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/132
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/134
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 01:33:49 UTC