W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Starting with Contexts and Schema.org

From: vikash agrawal <vikashagrawal1990@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:35:11 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKpG3NiYjDgjjwYS27reD21wn1DX0nO+9S1Y-shK2f8KEQo-NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Errors Noted!
Reading the spec and Rectifying!


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:29 AM, vikash agrawal <
vikashagrawal1990@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Nikalas,
>
> I have tried to understand your statements.
>
> So, I this would be first working Person schema,
> https://gist.github.com/ivikash/6041987 (Revision 7).
>
> If this looks good, I will file a PR and move to Places and events too :-)
>
> Regards
> ~Vikash
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Vikash,
>>
>> Also note that you don't need to add explicit "@id" mappings to the terms
>> since their names can be resolved against the defined "@vocab" value.
>>
>> Or I should say "should resolve", since there seems to be something
>> strange going on with some of them. For instance, both "presentAddress" and
>> "permanentAddress" are mapped to "http://schema.org/address", "image" is
>> mapped to "http://schema.org/url" and "phoneNumber" to "
>> http://schema.org/telephone" in your context. It seems like a copy-paste
>> error (apparently so if you look at "firstName", "middleName" and
>> "familyName"), and I don't think it is a good idea if it is intentional.
>> You should use the term names as defined in the vocabulary, unless you have
>> some very specific reason otherwise. What is your intention here?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Niklas
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM, vikash agrawal <
>> vikashagrawal1990@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank-You Markus and Dave,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Markus Lanthaler <
>>> markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, July 22, 2013 3:39 PM, vikash agrawal wrote:
>>>> > Thank-You Nikalas and Markus,
>>>> >
>>>> > I am pretty sure, I do have a lot of things to grasp. I
>>>> > did refer and read the spec after being advised by Manu
>>>> > and I am progressing.
>>>>
>>>> Good
>>>>
>>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > This is my very initial attempt to the context. And I
>>>> > think there might small or big mistakes and glitches.
>>>> > Can you please see to this and let me know my mistakes.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://gist.github.com/ivikash/6041987
>>>>
>>>> You don't need to type-coerce everything to @id. You only do that if
>>>> the value is a URL. The value of firstName, lastName etc. for sure isn't.
>>>> So you have to remove the "@type": "@id".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Over IRC, Dave really made me understand things, which I werent able to
>>> get in the first shot.
>>>
>>> I am writing the person context and share the gist link soon :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> > [Using GMail, and I hope its in ascii]
>>>>
>>>> Nope, it's HTML :-P
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Cant help it any more :P. Else I have to use mutt :D
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Markus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Markus Lanthaler
>>>> @markuslanthaler
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 19:06:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:38 UTC