Re: LevelGraph and JSONLD

2013/7/18 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

> On Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:02 PM, Matteo Collina wrote:
> > I got the principle and the possibility intrigues me a lot, and it
> > seems feasible to implement it on top of LevelGraph-JSONLD as a query
> > language. I still do not get what the output might be, given some
> > input documents and a frame. After I have a full example I can write
> > the support for it in LevelGraph-JSONLD. You should put a full framing
> > example in the playground, and update the spec, too!
> >
> > If you want to build it yourself, you can do a pull-request or I can
> > just give you committer access to LevelGraph-JSONLD :).
>
> Have a look at my playground:
>
>   http://www.markus-lanthaler.com/jsonld/playground/
>
> And click on the "Library" example at the top. Then make sure that the
> "Framed" tab is selected. If you look at the input document on the left
> side
> you'll see that the data isn't nested at all, the result however is. This
> is
> done according the specified frame on the right hand side.
>
> In my implementation you can also filter by @id, e.g., so if you would have
> multiple libraries, you could select the one you are interested in.
>
> There's no documentation for this right now but maybe looking at my
> implementation helps!? The interesting parts are in the nodeMatchesFrame
> method:
>
>   https://github.com/lanthaler/JsonLD/blob/master/Processor.php#L2278
>
> It still needs a bit of love and doesn't handle certain things yet (lists,
> reverse properties) but you should get the idea. Probably it's much easier
> to implement in LevelGraph since you can query more easily over triples.
> Dunno. Unfortunately I don't have the time right now to get my hands dirty
> but I can at least answer questions you may have :-P
>
> The other resource you might wanna look at are the framing tests:
>   https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/tree/master/test-suite/tests
>
>
> I do not pass all the tests since I modified some behavior, most of my
> modifications are described here
>   - value matching (https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/110)
>   - deep-filtering (https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/110)
>   - aggressive re-embedding
> (https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/119)
>   - named graphs (https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/118)
>

Ok, I finally got it, it works very well.

I would say that it almost work that way, but I can augment it and use the
frame as a query language on all the DB.
It might work very well, indeed. Thanks for the suggestion!

Cheers,

Matteo