- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:14:56 -0400
- To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
I have a question about recommending a canonical JSON-LD profile to RDF users. I would like to recommend a profile of JSON-LD that would be convenient for exchanging RDF data in JSON format, for use both by RDF-oriented processors and by JSON-oriented processors. The ideal would probably be something analogous to n-triples: very simple (few or no options), very predictable, and very easy to generate and consume by machine. Ease of human authoring is not a goal in this case. I would like to be able to point both RDF and JSON developers at the appropriate sections of the JSON-LD spec, so that they don't have to learn all the ins and outs of the context and other features of JSON-LD that they won't need when they are simply using JSON-LD in this way as a JSON serialization of RDF data. The goal would be something very simple, analogous to RDF/JSON https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/index.html# though I don't care if the exact same conventions are used. What JSON-LD profile should I recommend for this? A combination of Expanded and Flattened document forms? Thanks, David
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 17:15:25 UTC