W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 2nd 2013

From: David I. Lehn <dil@lehn.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:36:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CADcbRROMoo3NfQfty0aeBhLw+YsEzNLNAiBH+hQ9EUZf-f=1bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the topic of JSON-LD and RDF alignment, the Open Annotation community
> group would like to re-discuss the inability in JSON-LD to have lists with
> identity or other predicates.
> We had an Open Annotation community group face to face meeting in Europe at
> the beginning of last week and this was seen as a significant barrier to
> adoption with a relatively easy implementation path to correct it.  In
> essence we would very much appreciate issue 75 being re-opened.
> https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/75

What would the "relatively easy implementation path" look like?

Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 18:37:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:38 UTC