- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:15:45 +0100
- To: "'Pat Hayes'" <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: <public-linked-json@w3.org>, "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Point taken :-) We just revisited the issue in today's telecon and reverted the decision: RESOLVED: Use IRI in the JSON-LD specifications instead of URL. I will send out another notification after updating the spec. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Hayes [mailto:phayes@ihmc.us] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:27 PM > To: Markus Lanthaler > Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org; 'RDF WG' > Subject: Re: Intent to close ISSUE-205 > > Revolutionary though it may seem, I would suggest, when writing a Web > standard, to actually use the terminology defined by other normative > Web standards. That is, if you mean IRI, say "IRI", and if you mean > URL, say "URL". To do otherwise is at best confusing, and at worst so > bloody stupid that it is impossible to even discuss it politely. > > Pat > > On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > >> I propose that, in the same spirit, we redefine "resolution" to mean > >> "masturbate", but go on using "resolution" as it is more polite. > > > > I think I will continue to use "resolution" :-) > > > > > >> PS. If you wish, you may take this to be an objection, but as I have > >> already redefined "objection" to mean "eats spaghetti on > Wednesdays", > >> it will not really make a great deal of difference. > > > > Hmm... what would you propose as alternative? Keep using "IRI"? Use > "JSON-LD > > URL"? Talk about "links" instead and in the few places it actually > matters > > use IRI? Use a different term altogether? > > > > > > > > -- > > Markus Lanthaler > > @markuslanthaler > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 16:16:15 UTC