- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:57:44 +0200
- To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Monday, August 26, 2013 7:38 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > > No, lets please not go down that route. If we really need this, I think we > > should add a flag, something like "passContextAsValue". > > Such a flag wouldn't be needed if we just used an expanded value for > this case. Or we move that test to idltest as I proposed in the other mail I just sent. > > We must not forget to add those tests to the implementation reports > > as well. > > Yes, I sent out something a bit ago about getting a manifest created > for the idl tests, and an implementation report, for which I presume > the test subject is the spec itself. Is this something you could take > care of? Yeah I can.. but I will need some time. Perhaps it would be better if Dave did it given that he is the only one running (and passing) those tests. Dave, could you do that? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 10:58:13 UTC