W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2013

RE: Context processing of object without @context

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:57:44 +0200
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01d101cea314$42e76f20$c8b64d60$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Monday, August 26, 2013 7:38 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> > No, lets please not go down that route. If we really need this, I think
we
> > should add a flag, something like "passContextAsValue".
> 
> Such a flag wouldn't be needed if we just used an expanded value for
> this case.

Or we move that test to idltest as I proposed in the other mail I just sent.

> > We must not forget to add those tests to the implementation reports
> > as well.
> 
> Yes, I sent out something a bit ago about getting a manifest created
> for the idl tests, and an implementation report, for which I presume
> the test subject is the spec itself. Is this something you could take
> care of?

Yeah I can.. but I will need some time. Perhaps it would be better if Dave
did it given that he is the only one running (and passing) those tests.
Dave, could you do that?



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 10:58:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:39 UTC