W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2013

RE: Context processing of object without @context

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:57:44 +0200
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01d101cea314$42e76f20$c8b64d60$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Monday, August 26, 2013 7:38 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> > No, lets please not go down that route. If we really need this, I think
> > should add a flag, something like "passContextAsValue".
> Such a flag wouldn't be needed if we just used an expanded value for
> this case.

Or we move that test to idltest as I proposed in the other mail I just sent.

> > We must not forget to add those tests to the implementation reports
> > as well.
> Yes, I sent out something a bit ago about getting a manifest created
> for the idl tests, and an implementation report, for which I presume
> the test subject is the spec itself. Is this something you could take
> care of?

Yeah I can.. but I will need some time. Perhaps it would be better if Dave
did it given that he is the only one running (and passing) those tests.
Dave, could you do that?

Markus Lanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 10:58:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:39 UTC