Re: Starting with Contexts and Schema.org

hi Everyone,

Context Public.json ->https://gist.github.com/ivikash/6041987

Context Event.json ->https://gist.github.com/ivikash/6157882

Context Place.json ->https://gist.github.com/ivikash/6157930

I have one query, If schema.org says that the type is an organisation or
say postal address, it be expanded to an IRI, am i right?

I had a word with taaz, but can I get a slightly better insight at this.

Regards
~Vikash


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:35 AM, vikash agrawal <
vikashagrawal1990@gmail.com> wrote:

> Errors Noted!
> Reading the spec and Rectifying!
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:29 AM, vikash agrawal <
> vikashagrawal1990@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Nikalas,
>>
>> I have tried to understand your statements.
>>
>> So, I this would be first working Person schema,
>> https://gist.github.com/ivikash/6041987 (Revision 7).
>>
>> If this looks good, I will file a PR and move to Places and events too :-)
>>
>> Regards
>> ~Vikash
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vikash,
>>>
>>> Also note that you don't need to add explicit "@id" mappings to the
>>> terms since their names can be resolved against the defined "@vocab" value.
>>>
>>> Or I should say "should resolve", since there seems to be something
>>> strange going on with some of them. For instance, both "presentAddress" and
>>> "permanentAddress" are mapped to "http://schema.org/address", "image"
>>> is mapped to "http://schema.org/url" and "phoneNumber" to "
>>> http://schema.org/telephone" in your context. It seems like a
>>> copy-paste error (apparently so if you look at "firstName", "middleName"
>>> and "familyName"), and I don't think it is a good idea if it is
>>> intentional. You should use the term names as defined in the vocabulary,
>>> unless you have some very specific reason otherwise. What is your intention
>>> here?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Niklas
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM, vikash agrawal <
>>> vikashagrawal1990@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank-You Markus and Dave,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Markus Lanthaler <
>>>> markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, July 22, 2013 3:39 PM, vikash agrawal wrote:
>>>>> > Thank-You Nikalas and Markus,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I am pretty sure, I do have a lot of things to grasp. I
>>>>> > did refer and read the spec after being advised by Manu
>>>>> > and I am progressing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > This is my very initial attempt to the context. And I
>>>>> > think there might small or big mistakes and glitches.
>>>>> > Can you please see to this and let me know my mistakes.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://gist.github.com/ivikash/6041987
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't need to type-coerce everything to @id. You only do that if
>>>>> the value is a URL. The value of firstName, lastName etc. for sure isn't.
>>>>> So you have to remove the "@type": "@id".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Over IRC, Dave really made me understand things, which I werent able to
>>>> get in the first shot.
>>>>
>>>> I am writing the person context and share the gist link soon :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> > [Using GMail, and I hope its in ascii]
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, it's HTML :-P
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Cant help it any more :P. Else I have to use mutt :D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Markus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Markus Lanthaler
>>>>> @markuslanthaler
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 5 August 2013 17:57:58 UTC