- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 00:01:07 +0800
- To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>, "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
OK.. not really optimal but it will do it for the time being. I will repost my mails there. Thanks, Markus > -----Original Message----- > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:37 PM > To: Markus Lanthaler > Cc: 'Richard Cyganiak'; 'RDF WG'; 'Linked JSON' > Subject: Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG > > Markus, > > admin issue: I would propose to use the public-rdf-comments@w3.org > mailing list which is open, you can also subscribe and RDF WG members > usually follow that list, too. > > Ivan > > On May 22, 2012, at 17:29 , Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > > (My mails don't get through to public-rdf-wg so feel free to repost > them > > there) > > > > > >> Is there a particular reason why the RDF mapping is in the API spec > >> rather than in the language spec? > > > > The syntax spec is targeted JSON-LD authors that don't necessarily > have an > > RDF background. Furthermore it is not syntax but a transformation. We > > bundled all algorithms in the API spec. > > > > > >> Is the proposal that RDF-WG should take both the API spec and the > >> language spec to REC? > > > > Yes. The API spec is just not ready for prime time yet :-) > > > > > >> At first glance, these sections look great. I notice three things > >> though: > >> > >> 1. I'd prefer if the algorithms were defined in terms of standard > RDF > >> terminology (RDF graph, triple, IRI, etc.) rather than API > interfaces > >> that use quite different terminology (array of Statements, > Statement, > >> NamedNode, etc.) > > > > OK, I filed an issue for that [1] > > > > > >> 2. Examples would be great. > > > > There are a couple of example in the syntax spec [2], don't know if > you > > already saw them. > > > > > >> 3. Is it possible to serialize an RDF graph into a "pretty" JSON-LD > >> document using a context? I presume the answer is "yes" and involves > >> Compaction of the basic serialized output. > > > > Yes, exactly either by compacting or by framing. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/125 > > [2] http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-syntax/#markup-examples > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Markus Lanthaler > > @markuslanthaler > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 16:02:07 UTC