RE: Multiple graphs syntax (ISSUE-68)

> I am sorry, but I do not think that is really good. My use case is the
> serialization of an RDFa content; that content very often contains
> several graphs (e.g., there might be statements on some content the
> author defines, and then some other statements on the enclosing HTML
> file). The context for all these graphs are identical or, to be more
> exact, an RDFa processor has no way to find out (or it is very
> complicated) which context should be used for which graph. As a result,
> possibly complex contexts (with all the namespace definitions from the
> RDFa source) will be repeated. I think that is ugly.

What is the intended end use of this RDFa to JSON-LD conversion? You could,
e.g., directly create an expanded document without any contexts in it.



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler