- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:44:14 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <EEE52568-8152-410D-9785-3CC6EA1A9CE6@w3.org>
Ah! I did not realize this.
Here is how I hit this. I do an RDFa->JSON-LD conversion (via RDFLib as an intermediate RDF toolkit), and I would like the beautify the output. If the user in RDFa does
<span rel="http://www.ex.org/prop" resource="http://a.b.c"/>
<span rel="http://www.ex.org/prop" resource="http://p.q.r"/>
and there are no prefixes (or vocab) defined in the original source.
A simple json-ld is of course
{
"http://www.ex.org/prop" { "@id" : "http://a.b.c" } ,
"http://www.ex.org/prop" { "@id" : "http://p.q.r" }
}
but, to make it cleaner, it would be nice if I could say
{
"@context" {
"http://www.ex.org/prop" : { "@type" : "@id" }
}
"http://www.ex.org/prop" : "http://a.b.c" ,
"http://www.ex.org/prop" : "http://p.q.r"
}
Which would require to have the URI as a key.
Bottom line: I am very much in favour allowing this.
Ivan
On Jan 11, 2012, at 13:21 , Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> Ivan, this is ISSUE-43 which is currently being discussed. See:
> https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/43
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:07 PM
>> To: Linked JSON
>> Subject: Is this valid JSON-LD?
>>
>> Something that I have not seen anywhere in the document:
>>
>> {
>> "@context" : {
>> "http://www.example.org/pred" : { "@type" : "@id" }
>> },
>> ...
>> "http://www.example.org/pred" : "http://ivan-herman.net"
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> yielding
>>
>> [ <http://www.example.org/pred> <http://ivan-herman.net> ]
>>
>> I would expect the answer to be yes, but there is nowhere a more formal
>> definition of @context that would give me straight answer.
>>
>> This (and my question yesterday on the "@id" : [...] idiom) reinforces
>> my feeling that a somewhat more formal definition of the various json-
>> ld structures would be welcome in my view.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 13:43:27 UTC