- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:44:14 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <EEE52568-8152-410D-9785-3CC6EA1A9CE6@w3.org>
Ah! I did not realize this. Here is how I hit this. I do an RDFa->JSON-LD conversion (via RDFLib as an intermediate RDF toolkit), and I would like the beautify the output. If the user in RDFa does <span rel="http://www.ex.org/prop" resource="http://a.b.c"/> <span rel="http://www.ex.org/prop" resource="http://p.q.r"/> and there are no prefixes (or vocab) defined in the original source. A simple json-ld is of course { "http://www.ex.org/prop" { "@id" : "http://a.b.c" } , "http://www.ex.org/prop" { "@id" : "http://p.q.r" } } but, to make it cleaner, it would be nice if I could say { "@context" { "http://www.ex.org/prop" : { "@type" : "@id" } } "http://www.ex.org/prop" : "http://a.b.c" , "http://www.ex.org/prop" : "http://p.q.r" } Which would require to have the URI as a key. Bottom line: I am very much in favour allowing this. Ivan On Jan 11, 2012, at 13:21 , Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Ivan, this is ISSUE-43 which is currently being discussed. See: > https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/43 > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:07 PM >> To: Linked JSON >> Subject: Is this valid JSON-LD? >> >> Something that I have not seen anywhere in the document: >> >> { >> "@context" : { >> "http://www.example.org/pred" : { "@type" : "@id" } >> }, >> ... >> "http://www.example.org/pred" : "http://ivan-herman.net" >> ... >> } >> >> yielding >> >> [ <http://www.example.org/pred> <http://ivan-herman.net> ] >> >> I would expect the answer to be yes, but there is nowhere a more formal >> definition of @context that would give me straight answer. >> >> This (and my question yesterday on the "@id" : [...] idiom) reinforces >> my feeling that a somewhat more formal definition of the various json- >> ld structures would be welcome in my view. >> >> Thanks >> >> Ivan >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 13:43:27 UTC