- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:46:08 -0400
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-linked-json <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnHrFjRuEa=tWEuSquZ8NH5kJBV1W73CwG9HzWO=c0YygQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Markus, it works now! Steph. On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net > wrote: > You are right Stéphane, it was misinterpreted as a HTML tag (and thus > hidden) because it wasn’t escaped properly.**** > > I just pushed an update. It should be fixed now.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for bringing this up again, last time I just fixed it in my > playground [1] and forgot to do the same for the official one.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > [1] http://www.markus-lanthaler.com/jsonld/playground/**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > --**** > > Markus Lanthaler**** > > @markuslanthaler**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Stéphane Corlosquet [mailto:scorlosquet@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, August 17, 2012 5:45 PM > *To:* nil > *Cc:* public-linked-json > *Subject:* Re: Values with angle brackets**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:15 AM, nil <nil.niklas@gmail.com> wrote:**** > > Hi, > > I'm wondering why the playground omits values between < and > in the > output. > My example input: > { > "@context": { > "message-id": "http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nmo#messageId > " > }, > "message-id": > "<CAERg+cg3y+bKtk9KE5UMmK15+1+U191oUgVZaT=ifhB7YqaMAQ@mail.gmail.com>" > } > > The output (in Compacted form): > > { > "http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nmo#messageId": "" > } > > If I put text before / after the brackets, it becomes part of the > output. Do I need to escape the brackets? If so, why is that and where > is it documented?**** > > ** ** > > I can still reproduce this in the playground. It might be that the angle > bracket needs to be escaped? using < works. Not sure if the behavior > above is a bug in JSON-LD or in the playground. Seems like the round > tripping isn't working: the normalized output has the expected value, but > the compacted and expanded outputs don't. Can someone confirm what's going > on?**** > > ** ** > > Steph.**** >
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 16:46:36 UTC