- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:54:54 +0200
- To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: "'Olivier Grisel'" <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>, "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Oct 4, 2011, at 16:08 , Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> The question is really of practice, and we may have to look around >> for feedback. Ie: how easy is it, for different JSON libraries out >> there, to ensure order in parsing and, more importantly, for the >> production of JSON? Or do we require JSON-LD programmers, data >> producers, etc, to use non-standard tools? In other words, does the >> JSON community ignore the RFC spec and, in effect, uses ordering? > > I don't really like the idea of enforcing ordering since then it isn't 100% JSON anymore. A SHOULD in the spec and describing the advantage of allowing one-pass processing should do it IMHO. The use case isn't important enough to break "compliance" with standard JSON and I doubt that a lot of people will use JSON-LD in a streaming-mode. > Works for me. But I am not streaming:-) Ivan > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 14:53:56 UTC