Re: LinkedData != RDF ?

On 5/20/11 1:58 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> I think that would be a short term gain (people using something labeled
> "linked data" and people using URIs to identify things), but a long term
> loss, because (by having different formats for data), still no
> interoperability.
>
> I wouldn't be terribly opposed to reversing starts 4 and 5, so you do
> triples-with-shared-URIs first, then RDF second, ..
Sandro,

Is there an agreement re. going back to the original TimBL meme re. 
Linked Data i.e, one that replaces:
"When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the 
standards (RDF*, SPARQL)"

with the original that read:
When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information.

Either way, let's close this critical matter :)

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen