> > The use of the term "scope" is itself innappropriate for the current > system. If you want a hierarchical data structuring mechanism then you want > something altogether different. This difference is not a simple matter of > "property scope" - you will have to toss a number of features of the current > system. Maybe that meets your needs, but it is a huge change. Better to > begin a whole new set of standards with clearly expressed goals, I would > say... the differences are to the core of the current standards. > You're kind of rephrasing the question: what *are* the goals here? Is JSON-LD a RDF serialization, or a convention for representing graphs in JSON, or something else? If it's strictly an RDF serialization, then I probably don't care about it, but I thought the whole point of "JSON-LD" as a new effort distinct from the RDF/JSON working group was to reopen precisely this question, so that it might be answered in a way that would lead to significantly simpler and more accessible spec... gReceived on Monday, 27 June 2011 21:30:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:29 UTC