- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:56:01 -0400
- To: "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 06/18/2011 09:52 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote: > Just to be a little more precise about these two: I don't believe that > direct and completely reversible transcriptions of RDFa or Microformat > data with exact semantic correspondence should necessarily be a core > requirement of JSON-LD. I agree that it doesn't need to be a /core/ requirement. It is for the PaySwarm use case, as our company reads data from the distributed Web in RDFa and stores it in JSON-LD format. However, lossless translation from RDFa/Microformats/Microdata to JSON-LD doesn't have to be a core requirement. That being said, JSON-LD does support this now as a side-effect of supporting RDF. > I agree that directed, labeled graphs > represented in RDFa or Microformats (or RDF or Topic Maps or whatever > else) should be straightforwardly translatable to JSON-LD, but to me > this is exactly the same as saying that JSON-LD exists to represent > directed, labeled graphs in JSON in the first place... It seems as if we're agreeing on that point - what am I missing? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Developer Tools and Demo Released http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/05/05/payswarm-sandbox/
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 14:56:24 UTC