- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:28:47 +0200
- To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 28 July 2011 20:45, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 07/28/2011 02:19 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: >> I have an issue with "Labeled and Directed" - try using it in a >> conversation with a Web Developer that doesn't know about this area - Linked >> Data, Semantic Web, etc. It will take quite a bit to explain to them what >> "Labeled and Directed" means. Ah, right, I can imagine. I guess that should be dropped. >> Kingsley, Dave, Danny - what about: >> >> "JSON for Linking Data" - JSON-LD >> >> That way, the name itself is fairly self-explanatory and we don't muddy >> the waters by using the "Linked Data" terminology in the spec's name. We can >> have a definition of "Linked Data" in the spec, and tell them that is the >> ideal we want to move towards, but that the "JSON for Linking Data" allows >> them to express Linked Data as well as other types of non-Linked data. >> Thoughts? >> >> -- manu >> > > I would be fine with "JSON for Linking Data". Me too. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 19:29:15 UTC