- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:11:38 -0400
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 07/26/2011 10:49 AM, Dean Landolt wrote:
> I understand
> the idea of standardizing a way to represent directed, labeled
> graphs in JSON. I do not understand the point of this "JSON-SD"
> thing at all.
>
> I was under the impression that the difference between JSON-SD and
> JSON-LD is that JSON-SD + out-of-band schema could very well create
> JSON-LD. I may be misinterpreting the intent of JSON-SD though :)
Well, this JSON-SD/JSON-LD split is clearly confusing people. It is a
sign that we're on the wrong path.
Here was the intent:
1. Both JSON-SD/CD/LSD and JSON-LD allows one to have both in-band and
out-of-band @context.
2. Both solutions allow you to express Linked Data.
3. If you use an unlabeled node, you have a JSON-SD document.
4. If you use IRI identifiers for all of your nodes, you have a JSON-LD
document.
-- manu
--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Uber Comparison of RDFa, Microformats and Microdata
http://manu.sporny.org/2011/uber-comparison-rdfa-md-uf/
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 04:12:01 UTC