- From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:04:45 -0400
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: glenn mcdonald <glenn@furia.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> The question is, do unnamed nodes have a place in Linked Data
> and in JSON-LD? I think they do; anyone else?
I believe IRI-less nodes can be useful within a process.
They're almost always troublesome as soon as usage moves beyond 
that -- because how can I identify "that node you didn't identify
except to say that it existed in context of your last answer"?
((
Aside --
Earlier in this thread the word "label" was used where here you
use "name" and where I am using "IRI".
To my mind... 
"Label" is like a sticker holding a (best case) human-friendly 
literal string that helps the human understand the thing on which 
that sticker has been stuck.
"Name" is an identifier, which might be an IRI, might be a literal
string, might be something else.
"IRI" is relatively unambiguous.  
"HTTP IRI" seems to me quite unambiguous, and is hopefully clearly 
a subset of "IRI".
))
Be seeing you,
Ted
--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 19:05:43 UTC