>
> In common JSON usage, consider the following:
>
> {
> "@subject": "http://greggkellogg.net/foaf#me",
> "@type": "Person"
> "home-address": {
> "@type": "Address",
> "city": "San Rafael",
> "region": "California"
> }
> }
>
>
> Having to specify an IRI for the "home-address" item runs against much
> common usage. Why should this usage be discouraged?
>
This is fine data, but it's not a Linked Data graph. That is, it's not
linked (can't refer to the address, city or region (or either type) as
nodes), and it's a tree rather than a graph. Are we trying to magically
transform JSON trees into graphs, or are we trying to describe how people
with graphs should publish them in JSON? Or something else?
glenn
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 16:49:42 UTC