W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2011

Re: About @type, @ and other tokens

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:42:50 -0400
To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
CC: Alexandre Passant <alex@seevl.net>, "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3DC7062E-4F54-4059-A537-3FBABDBED84B@kellogg-assoc.com>
With some minor processing rule changes, this could just use regular @context term/prefix definitions.

{ "iri": "@source" ...}

Gregg Kellogg
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:52 AM, "Niklas Lindström" <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Alexandre Passant <alex@seevl.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Regarding the "@source instead of @" and "@type instead of a" issues
>> on the current spec.
>> I'd favor a way to let this be defined in a context, in addition to
>> the default value.
>> [...]
>> I will make the spec more flexible as allowing people to use the
>> naming they prefer - while keeping the RDF similar.
> 
> Absolutely. I do a similar thing in the new Gluon profile sketch at [1]:
> 
>    "reserved": {
>      "vocab": "vocab",
>      "about": "id",
>      "multipleSuffix": "Set",
>      ...
> 
> (as mentioned in [2]).
> 
> Best regards,
> Niklas
> 
> [1]: http://code.google.com/p/oort/source/browse/etc/gluon/drafts/profile-redesign.json?r=b7e4f413603a
> [2]: http://dustfeed.blogspot.com/2011/07/resources-in-various-frames-of-json.html
> 
Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 17:43:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:30 UTC