- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:35:06 -0700
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 17:35:52 UTC
On 8/29/11 3:35 AM, Danny Ayers wrote: > I'm afraid the future-proofing argument looks spurious to me. +1 Not just spurious, its a pattern that's been implemented back to front repeatedly. You future-proof by eliminating FUD vectors first. Ditto anything with prior political baggage. CURIEs is a two-fer. Its a FUD vector with stacks of political baggage. It needs to join skolemization and other RDFisms in the boiler room. We need to keep the front-door clean and engaging to the target audience. Boiler room doesn't mean it can't be implemented by processors that care about such matters. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 17:35:52 UTC