- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:22:02 -0400
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2011 17:22:37 UTC
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: Gregg Kellogg wrote: Framed is definitely an issue, since passing a URI as a mime-type parameter would be a non-starter; probably not sufficient to set format=framed without some other out-of-band communication of the frame. Note that application/json+ld;format=framed is reasonable as a Content-Type. Why would be passing a URI as a mime-type parameter be a non-starter? Hmm, on further consideration, perhaps it's not a problem after all. Maybe we can use another Link header, such as: Link: <http://example.com/framing.jsonld>; rel="stylesheet"; type="application/ld+json" The framing document is something of a stylesheet, so this would seem appropriate. Gregg Also, I'd like to keep the straight application/ld+json for an un- specified serialization. My library tries to be intelligent about creating @context/@coerce entries and use of chaining along the lines of other serializers I've written. This may not be specified, but it should be allowed. The parameter is optional, so that shouldn't be a problem. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2011 17:22:37 UTC