- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:52:58 +0200
- To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
I didn’t have much time to think about this yet, but here are two things I noticed so far: > 4. There MUST be a way label a JSON object with an IRI. Should be: There MUST be a way *to* label ... > 15. Without explicit syntactic support, JSON arrays MUST NOT > be interpreted as defining an object ordering. > 16. A JSON-LD document SHOULD be able to express and ordered > list objects. Why are we inconsistent with the JSON spec in this regard? RFC4627 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627) is quite clear about this: An object is an unordered collection of zero or more name/value pairs, where a name is a string and a value is a string, number, boolean, null, object, or array. An array is an ordered sequence of zero or more values. Will think a bit more about the rest of it tomorrow. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2011 20:53:26 UTC