- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:42:14 +0200
- To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Gregg Kellogg wrote > We'll also need a MIME type for a JSON-LD context, which > is a subset of JSON-LD, as only the @context elements are > parsed, and the processing entrypoint is at > http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/#context. > > The latest version of the spec describes a context document > as being just the JSON description of the context, not the > enclosing @context relationship. > ... > In which case, I'd suggest application/ld-context+json and > an extension of .jsonldc. What about doing it similar to Atom which uses a MIME type for that: application/atom+xml;type=entry So, e.g. application/ld+json;type=context > Given that it really is a different document type, I'd go > with the separate MIME type and extension. I'm not really a fan of this sort of MIME type pollution and would definitely favor a type parameter for such "details". -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 12:42:45 UTC