- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:20:37 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: public-linked-json@w3.org
Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 8/3/11 12:08 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> We currently use: application/x-json+ld . >> What was the rationale behind this? Why didn't you use >> application/x-ld+json? > > Cos I had to make the decision in nano seconds, literally. We can change > it once there is clear consensus :-) +1 from me for application/ld+json to signify +json compatibility. and +1 for application/x-ld+json in the interim until there is a proper mime type registered, which is good practise / following the rules. note: not application/x-json+ld Best, Nathan
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 16:21:45 UTC