- From: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:57:37 +0000
- To: Andrew Woods <awoods@duraspace.org>, "A. Soroka" <ocymum@gmail.com>
- CC: LDP Next <public-ldpnext@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <95BF44E1-CCA1-4853-A9D9-03FE3B177F6A@corp.base22.com>
Are one of you able to summarize, in writing, the Weak ETags and If-Match issue or help me locate the original thread that brought it up? Sorry – I can’t seem to find it. It would be helpful to me to have a summary (as clear as possible) prior to the meeting. - Cody From: Andrew Woods <awoods@duraspace.org> Date: Friday, September 16, 2016 at 1:13 PM To: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com> Cc: LDP Next <public-ldpnext@w3.org> Subject: Re: LDP Next Community Group Update Hello Cody and All, Thanks again for coordinating the recurring LDP-Next meetings. As for next week's call, I must send my regrets due to conflicting travel. I am confident, however, there will be others on the line to speak to the topic of: - Weak ETags and If-Match Regards, Andrew On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com<mailto:cody.burleson@base22.com>> wrote: Team, Thank you for voting on a day/time for regularly scheduled bi-weekly meetings. The vote has been won for every other Thursday from 2:00 – 3:30 pm CST. In respect for the upcoming SEMANTiCS conference<http://2016.semantics.cc/> in Leipzig, we’ll have to wait until Thursday, Sept 22, 2016, 2:00 - 3:30 pm CST for the next meeting. So far, the following agenda item has been posted by a CG member to discuss: • Weak ETags and If-Match, see: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldpnext/2016Aug/0002.html Please feel free to add your own agenda items by editing the agenda the group’s wiki page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/LDP_Next_Community_Group (Email me directly if you don’t have the access you need and I will edit the page for you.) As an experiment, I’ve set up a Slack channel for the group. Please direct email me (cody at base22.com<http://base22.com>) for an invite to that channel. We don’t need to wait for meetings to have an ongoing discussion and make progress. Thanks, Cody
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 22:58:10 UTC