W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2015

Re: describedby registration

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:52:32 +0100
Message-ID: <54F6F200.7070509@berkeley.edu>
To: public-ldp@w3.org
CC: Simeon Warner <simeon.warner@cornell.edu>
hello.

On 2015-03-04 12:43, Simeon Warner wrote:
> On 3/2/15 2:38 PM, Steve Speicher wrote:
>> I believe the intent was that the current registration of
>> "describedby" was limited to the definition in POWDER [1].  So we
>> clarified it within LDP.  From what I recall, there was no need to
>> add any clarity to the definition of "describes" as it is
>> satisfactory as written for the needs of LDP.

"describedby" is *defined* by POWDER, but by no means limited to it. on 
the contrary, it's defined very open-ended as link relations should be:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-powder-dr-20090901/#appD:

"Description: The relationship A 'describedby' B asserts that resource B 
provides a description of resource A. There are no constraints on the 
format or representation of either A or B, neither are there any further 
constraints on either resource. "

so there really is no need to fork things. forking is always a risky 
thing to do and thus should be avoided whenever possible.

cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2015 11:53:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:38 UTC