- From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:45:07 +0200
- To: public-ldp <public-ldp@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAOEr1k=4OnBe9VFaYRQ_F+JR9P-H-pHLr=vPt-2f0QQfhHD=Q@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Best Regards, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya Ontology Engineering Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Henry Story < henry.story@co-operating.systems> wrote: > > > On 15 Jun 2015, at 22:25, Andrei Sambra <andrei@w3.org> wrote: > > > > Dear members of the LDP WG, > > > > Even though the charter for LDP 1.0 is nearing its expiration date, we > still have plenty of work ahead of us, which is why we have recently > proposed a new charter for LDP Next [0]. To be able to recharter LDP Next, > W3C’s process requires that a certain number of W3C members vote to allow > the WG to exist. However, at this point we do not have a clear indication > of how many members (companies or individuals) are interesting in > continuing the work, which is what this email is about. > > > > I would like to formally invite everyone on this list to indicate > whether they plan to participate in LDP Next, by replying to this email. > This is not supposed to be a discussion, but rather a vote-like process. > You can simply add a +1 if you plan to participate. > > +1 for me. Of course this cannot be formal as that would have to go > through more of Apache members I suppose. I asked Andy Seaborne, who felt > it may be a bit soon to start the next WG. I'd be fine with an intermediary > CG period too - though not too long. Eg starting January next year for me > seems like we'd have had ample time to prepare the ground for the next WG. > > > > > > Best, > > Andrei Sambra > > > > > > [0] https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/LDPNext2015_Charter > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 11:45:58 UTC