W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > August 2015

IANA registration of Prefer parameters

From: Martin P Pain <martinpain@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:50:48 +0100
To: public-ldp@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFDE234428.BBE69D51-ON80257EA6.005182CA-80257EA6.00518F3C@uk.ibm.com>
Has anything happened about registering the "include" and "omit" 
preferences for the "return=representation" preference with IANA?

I can't see anything in RFC 7240 (HTTP Prefer) that talks about 
registering additional optional parameters on an existing preference. 
However, merely defining them and not having the registry updated seems to 
go against the spirit of having a registry.

I am asking as a discussion elsewhere has resulted in the suggestion of 
using a new parameter in a similar way, and I want to benefit from LDP's 
discussion of the parameters defined here (and I can't find them in the 
mailing list archives).

Many thanks,
Martin Pain
Software Developer - Green Hat
Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel


E-mail: martinpain@uk.ibm.com
Find me on:  and within IBM on:  




IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 
3AU 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 01-part)

picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 02-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 03-part)

Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 14:51:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:40 UTC