- From: Martynas Jusevicius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 00:19:01 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Reto Gmür <reto@apache.org>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
> There's nothing in the spec that's designed for Turtle. We're well aware > of other RDF syntaxes, including RDF/XML and JSON-LD. The fact that you > can't access all LDP features from N-Triples and N-Quads does not seem to me > to be a serious problem. Sandro, all the proponents of the relative-URI proposal have come from the WG, but in public comments the opinions are not quite unanimous. What about the completely real possibility that the WG takes the wrong choice here -- is that not a serious problem? Martynas graphityhq.com
Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 22:19:29 UTC