W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Fwd: Practical issues arising from the "null relative URIs"-hack

From: (wrong string) Ĩius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 00:19:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE35VmzgmEzxggZoLC=HbGQSC1qBoEHi=9eNe6Lh82Bj9n37ug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Reto Gmür <reto@apache.org>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
> There's nothing in the spec that's designed for Turtle.    We're well aware
> of other RDF syntaxes, including RDF/XML and JSON-LD.    The fact that you
> can't access all LDP features from N-Triples and N-Quads does not seem to me
> to be a serious problem.

Sandro, all the proponents of the relative-URI proposal have come from
the WG, but in public comments the opinions are not quite unanimous.
What about the completely real possibility that the WG takes the wrong
choice here -- is that not a serious problem?

Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 22:19:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:37 UTC