Re: JSON-LD errors in LDP spec

Dear Gregg,

Thank you for pointing out the issues. We will fix both issues in the
working draft asap and also check with Eric whether we can update the
comments emails in the published version.

Best Regards,
Nandana


On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
wrote:

> In addition to the JSON-LD problem noted in the mail to
> public-ldp-wg@w3.org, the spec says to send comments to a restricted
> list; this should be updated to public-ldp@w3.org.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: public-ldp-wg-request@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: JSON-LD errors in LDP spec
> > Date: July 4, 2014 at 3:31:08 PM PDT
> > To: gregg@greggkellogg.net
> >
> > Posting to this mailing list is restricted to members of the
> > Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group.
> >
> > If you are not a member of this group, please send any comments
> > to public-ldp@w3.org.
> >
> > If you are a member of the group, please verify that you are posting
> > from the correct address. If you need to update the email address
> > associated with your W3C account, you may do so using
> > https://www.w3.org/Systems/db/userInfo
> >
> > A Twitter user noticed a problem with some of the JSON-LD published in =
> > <
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-primer/ldp-primer.html#=
> > navandret>. In particular, the example in section 3.1 is invalid JSON. =
> > Even when correcting, it does not evaluate using =
> > http://json-ld.org/playground, probably because there are missing CORS =
> > headers on your context. Also note, that the context either needs to be =
> > repeated for each element, included in a surrounding element, or use an =
> > embedded form for the content.
> >
> > An alternative version of this example could be:
> >
> > {
> >  "@id": "",
> >  "@type": [ "ldp:DirectContainer", "bt:Product"],
> >  "@context": =
> > "https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-primer/context.json",
> >  "dc:title": "Product description of LDP Demo product which is also an =
> > LDP-DC",
> >  "ldp:contains": [{ "@id": "bug3"}, { "@id": "bug4"}],
> >  "ldp:hasMemberRelation": "bt:hasBug",
> >  "ldp:membershipResource": {
> >      "@id": "#it",
> >      "@type": "bt:Product",
> >      "dc:title": "LDP Demo",
> >      "bt:hasBug": [{ "@id": "bug3"}, { "@id": "bug4"} ]
> >  }
> > }
> >
> > Example 28 in section 3.2 , Example 32 in section 3.3, Example 34 in =
> > 4.1, Example 35 and 37 in 4.2 all have similar problems.
> >
> > I'd recommend validating examples as part of the publication process.
> >
> > Gregg Kellogg
> > gregg@greggkellogg.net
> >
> >
>
>
>