- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:24:34 -0500
- To: public-ldp@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52CAAE92.1040107@openlinksw.com>
On 1/6/14 8:02 AM, John Arwe wrote: > > What I want to point out is that resource representations and graphs > > are different dimensions of Linked Data. > > Violently agree ;-) > I'd go further: they're so far apart conceptually that using a single > word to encompass both (dimensions) could be seen as the same problem. > The old apples vs oranges meme. Yes, and a suggested solution to this eternal conflation issue: just use every possible ounce of energy to drop the word "graph" [1][2]. We have documents, content (representation of statements that conform to the rules of a specific language), document locations (addresses), and entity names. Put differently, we have the following webs: 1. Documents 2. Entity Description Documents 3. Entity Description Documents that include human and machine comprehensible relation semantics. Links: [1] http://bit.ly/INv6ag -- Linked Data (no mention of "Graph") [2] http://bit.ly/1jlHsq9 -- Semantically enhanced Linked Data (no mention of "Graph"). -- Happy New Year! Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 6 January 2014 13:24:57 UTC