- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:33:39 -0400
- To: public-ldp@w3.org
- Message-ID: <533A0963.7090304@openlinksw.com>
On 3/31/14 6:40 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org > <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote: > > On 03/26/2014 05:32 PM, Reto Gmür wrote: >> LDP defines (implicitly somewhere) a relationship between the >> graph name and the graph (the graph describes the resource >> identified by graph name) and allows returning the dataset >> instead of the graph. > > Yeah, that's hinted at by the example. I'm starting to think we > should take out all mention of named graphs and leave that for a > future spec that defines a mechanism by which clients can ask > servers to give them a dataset (eg a BasicContainer and all its > members as named graphs). > > > Probably that is a good move I think. IIRC, we introduced named graph > concept to clarify this special case where the containers embed its > members and not to loose the provenance of the triples that are coming > from members which are not part of the container state. However, > apparently it has led to more confusion than clarity. > > Best Regards, > Nandana Yes. Please note, there is nothing about data provenance (metadata) that mandates quads. You can describe RDF statements using RDF statements too [1]. If I create an RDF document that's denoted by an HTTP URL, nothing stops me making RDF statements about the document in question. If I want to actually describe statements that comprise my document, I can do that too by denoting each statement with its own URI. [1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1999%2F02%2F22-rdf-syntax-ns%23Statement&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1999%2F02%2F22-rdf-syntax-ns%23 - RDF Statement Description [2] http://bit.ly/1eUSMl2 -- example of reification applied to the massive Uniprot datasets from our LOD Cloud Cache (live 50 Billion RDF triples instance -- which is all about demonstrating that triples count isn't a reason to discount existing RDF statement reification capabilities) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2014 00:34:01 UTC