- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:24:58 +0200
- To: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 15:25:30 UTC
On 10 September 2013 16:15, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Melvin, > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Is it a requirement of LDP servers to support HEAD requests as well as >> GET. Is it implied that since you can do a GET, you will be able to do a >> HEAD? >> > > Yes, that is the case. It is not implied really, it is explicitly stated > in the spec that you need to support HEAD. The motivation (recalling WG > discussions) was that a number of scenarios were seen as valuable to be > able to do various tests on the URL and also receive additional data (such > as paging and type headers), instead of needing to fetch the entire > resource (perhaps a container and all its members). Also the effort to > support HEAD in addition to GET is relatively small (just omit the entity > body in the response). > Perfect, thanks! > > Hope that helps, > - Steve Speicher > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 15:25:30 UTC