- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:41:11 -0400
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- CC: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
On 06/13/2013 02:26 PM, Erik Wilde wrote: > if you ask around elsewhere and ask "do you want your data to be > interlinked", most say yes. if you then ask "do you want this to be > only done using RDF", people mostly say no. i have no poll to back > this up, it is just my personal experience. I would agree, and that is a perfect illustration of the difference between a term of Art and a generic, descriptive use of a term. As a generic descriptive term (to one who is not aware of its meaning as a term of Art) "linked data" may suggest *any* form of connected data -- such as database tables that are connected. But within a specific communities the term may have a significantly more constrained meaning as a term of art. David
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 19:41:38 UTC